Yeah, you get where I'm coming from with the whole goosebumps thing? It's a good trailer.
The problem is, I didn't like the book.
Now, before any of you Hunger Games fans freak out ... well ... nah, whatever. You can freak out. I'm about to explain the problem that I found with the book, and I don't really have anything to tone it down with, or a "however" or an "on the other hand" to conclude with, so if you feel insulted by the above statement feel free to look away now. I would hope that you're more curious than that.
Anyway, I purchased a copy of the book in 2010, because I was in America at the time and ever window and shelf in Barnes & Noble was covered in Mockingjay, the conclusion to the trilogy. So I thought, what the hey, I'll see what all the hype is about. I'm pretty slow on the uptake when it comes to fandoms (see this post). The copy at B & N was about $23.97 or something ridiculous, so I went to Walmart and got a cheap paperback version for $6.90. Much better. I read it over a few days on the back porch at my Grandpa's house, but after the first few chapters it hadn't really grabbed me. Reading material was scarce however, so I kept going to the end.
The problem I had with the book was partly the writing style, but to be more specific, Katniss' voice and her emotional detachment to things. I'm gonna pull a Dana here and quote directly from the book to give you some examples of what I mean:
We [Katniss and Peeta] turn back to face the crowd as the anthem of Panem plays. Oh well, I think. There will be twenty-four of us. Maybe someone else will kill him before I do. (pg. 33)
The boy from District 1 dies before he can pull out the spear. My arrow drives deeply into the center of his neck. He falls to his knees and halves the brief remainder of his life by yanking out the arrow and drowning in his own blood. (pg. 233)
She's rather factual, isn't she? Sure, I get that they have to kill each other to survive. Yes, Katniss will just have to get over the idea of killing people to save her own life and not worry about who is dead. But that's just the problem! There seems to be no shock for her about the brutality of these games. She doesn't get used to it - she already is. I understand that she would have seen the games beforehand, so she knows what to expect, but I as the reader have not. I wanted to be able to grow with Katniss as the story progressed, not catch up to her. A reader should either be ahead or on par with their narrator, and on for the emotional part of the story, I felt like I was being left behind.
Not to mention there's a weird/lame fake-romance storyline that develops in the second half of the book. Not sure what I thought of that.
I enjoyed the concept of this novel (even though the whole dystopian thing wasn't much explained), but found it hard to connect with the characters.
NOW - here's the clincher. The reason why I started this post in the first place. We have a movie coming out. And unless a movie is really, really bad, if you like stories, you're more than likely to get emotionally involved with one. Movies can quite often be much better at emotionally involving the viewer than a book can, simply because it's visual (and there's epic background music). A film is able to capture more of your senses than a book can. Don't take me wrong, I love books. That's why I'm feeling a bit weird about this....
I've never felt this way before....
Is it possible that I could enjoy the movie more than I enjoyed the book?
Is it even possible for a movie to be better than a book?
March 23rd, folks. March 23rd will reveal all. Stay tuned.
No comments:
Post a Comment